Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Susanek

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1926No. Appeal 100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The record in this case is somewhat complicated but we are satisfied that it discloses no harmful error committed in the court below nor any injustice done the appellant.

Appellant was charged with wilfully neglecting to support his child born out of lawful wedlock, in violation of the Act of July 11,1917, P. L. 773, as amended by the Act of June 21, 1919, P. L. 1075. He pleaded (1) autrefois convict; (2) autrefois acquit; and (3) not guilty. His evidence on the trial was confined to his special pleas of former conviction and formal acquittal. No defense was presented on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GreevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Hilands v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Commonwealth v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Commonwealth v. CastellanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. ShoenerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DunnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. PewattsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. DudenhoefferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Commonwealth v. PainterWestmoreland County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API