Legal Opinion
Nebraska Plastics, Inc. v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 17, 1999No. A98A2268PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly concluded that the parties to a contract were relieved of their obligations by an alleged subsequent agreement. Because we conclude that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether the parties entered into a valid subsequent agreement and, if so, whether an accord and satisfaction occurred, we reverse.
In January 1997, Nebraska Plastics, Inc. (Nebraska Plastics) entered into a “warehousing agreement” with Howard Harris and Lee Harris, d/b/a Country Estate Fence of Georgia (collectively referred to as “CEFG”),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wallace v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Century 21 Pinetree Properties, Inc. v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- DeRosa v. ShiahCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Pierson v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Gainesville Paint & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paul Dean Corp. v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Hayes v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Regions Bank v. Wachovia Bank, NA (In Re Goldberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2000
- UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. BUDGET SERVICES & SUPPLIES, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025