Legal Opinion

Raydiant Technology, LLC v. Fly-N-Hog Media Group, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2014No. SD 32478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

Fly-N-Hog, an Arkansas company, licensed software and equipment to Raydi-ant, a Missouri company. After significant product difficulties, Raydiant filed suit in Missouri, alleging that Fly-N-Hog fraudulently induced Raydiant to enter the contract. Fly-N-Hog successfully moved to dismiss, citing the parties’ contractual agreement to litigate disputes in Arkansas. Raydiant appeals. We affirm.

This Forum Selection Agreement

The parties agreed in their contract:

• “that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement shall be tried and litigated exclusively in the State and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Major v. McCallisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Hope's Windows, Inc. v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Provence v. National Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Casey v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. H&R Block Tax Services LLC v. ThomasDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2018
  3. January v. Invasix, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  4. Roy Karon and Peddler LLC v. Elliott Aviation, James Mitchell, Wynn Elliott, Elliott Aviation Aircraft Sales, Inc., and Elliott JetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
  5. Thieret Family, LLC. v. Delta Plains Services, LLC, and Justin A. Brown, Adam Horton and Mike Still, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API