Legal Opinion

United States v. John Herbert Eades

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1980No. 78-5216PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:

A divided panel of this court reversed the defendant’s conviction on two counts under the Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 13, of third degree sexual offenses in violation of Article 27, § 464B(a)(l)(iii) of the Annotated Code of Maryland.1 The government filed a petition for rehearing en banc, which was granted. Now, after oral argument before the en banc court, a majority of the judges in regular active service holds that the defendant’s conviction on Counts 2 and 6 of the third degree sexual offenses was not precluded by 18 U.S.C.A. § 113. The reasons for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. John Herbert Eades, United States of America v. Larry F. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  2. United States v. Richard Bruce CoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Learley Reed GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Kenneth VaughanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API