Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Wells

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Teial of an issue of fact. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

The question in controversy arises upon the construction of the residuary clause of the will of William Wells, deceased.

It is as follows: “ I give, devise and bequeath unto my said wife, Elizabeth H. Wells, all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, of every name and description, wherever the same is or may be located, to have and to hold the same for and during her natural life, and at her death so much thereof as shall then remain shall be divided equally among my children, ” etc. A subsequent clause of the will empowered the executor to sell and convey, upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Leggett v. . FirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. In Re the Appeal From the Assessment of Taxes Upon the Legatees, Under the Will of CagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Rose v. . HatchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Thomas v. WolfordNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of DawleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API