Legal Opinion
Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 2026No. C-240668PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Preterm-Cleveland v. Yost,
2026-Ohio-23.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO PRETERM-CLEVELAND, : APPEAL NO. C-240668 TRIAL NO. A-2203203 PLANNED PARENTHOOD : SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION, : SHARON LINER, M.D., JUDGMENT ENTRY : PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER OHIO, : WOMEN’S MED GROUP : PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, : and : NORTHEAST OHIO WOMEN’S CENTER, LLC, d.b.a. TOLEDO : WOMEN’S CENTER, : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : vs. : DAVID YOST, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OHIO, : BRUCE T. VANDERHOFF, M.D., MBA, : DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, : KIM G. ROTHERMEL, M.D.,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kogan v. Weaver Const. and Roofing, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Women's Med Dayton v. VanderhoffOhio Court of Appeals · 2026