Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 9, 1942No. 161PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

This action was brought by the administratrix of Stewart’s estate to recover for his death in consequence of a violation of the Safety Appliance Act.1 The crew of which the intestate was a member was engaged in coupling freight cars. Stewart was on the engineer’s side of the train. He gave a back-up signal with which the engineer complied and then a stop signal which was obeyed. The engineer saw him go between the ends of the last car of the train and the car that was to be coupled to it. While the train was stationary, this car drifted into collision with the end car of the train. Persons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. Whitaker v. PitcairnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Seven Provinces Insurance v. Commerce & Industry InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1975
  4. Barnett v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Oklahoma Radio Associates, an Oklahoma General Partnership of J. Patrick Collins and Greg L. Armstrong J. Patrick Collins, an Individual and Greg L. Armstrong, an Individual v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Citizens National Bank and Trust Company v. Magnolia Broadcasting Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API