Milner v. J.H. Lewis Son
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The first two assignments of error relate to the rulings of the court in permitting plaintiff to testify that he and his son were the owners of the piano in question. This did not call for a conclusion, but was testimony as to a fact. A witness may properly testify as to who is the owner of personal property. Daffron v. Crump, 69 Ala. 77; Steiner v. Tranum, 98 Ala. 315, 13 So. 365; Rasco v. Jefferson, 142 Ala. 705, 38 So. 246.
The cause was tried before the court without a jury. The evidence was taken ore tenus, and was conflicting. Under these conditions the presumptions are in favor of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steiner Bros. v. TranumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Daffron v. CrumpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Rasco v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Schlossburg v. WillinghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- M. C. Kiser Co. v. PopeAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramsey v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925