Legal Opinion
Tabor v. Ford
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1951No. 21392PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroaddus, P.J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff, Charles E. Tabor, against Julia Ford, defendant, wherein plaintiff seeks judgment for rent overcharges, (three times the amount of overcharges) and attorney’s fees, under the provisions of Section 205 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A. 925, amended June 30, 1944.
Under the aboA^e subsection it is provided that if a seller charges the buyer in excess of the price fixed under authority of the law, the buyer may sue the seller and recover treble the amount of the overcharge, or not less than $25 nor more than $50, whichever sum is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Woods v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Willis v. American National Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shqeir v. Equifax, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Addison v. JesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Fielder v. Credit Acceptance Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1998
- Landum v. LivingstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.