Legal Opinion

Indo Oil Co. v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1949No. 33423Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

In connection with the application as to rehearing, it is contended that in the opinion'heretofore filed in this cause the court overlooked the fact that C. H. Hartman, as manager, part-owner and president of the Indo Oil Company, plaintiff in error, was made a party defendant in this action; that the trial court sustained a demurrer to the evidence as against the said defendant C. H. Hartman, plaintiff in error herein, who had filed a disclaimer and answer in which he disclaimed all interest in the leasehold estate and property on which the lien was sought to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leasburge v. HornerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API