Legal Opinion
Granger v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 17, 1935No. 26544PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an original proceeding commenced in this court by petitioners wherein a writ of mandamus is sought against the respondents commanding them to provide proper appropriations for the salaries of petitioners for the fiscal year 1935-1936.
The petitioners are members of the fire department of the city of Tulsa. They complain that the mayor and board of commissioners, the legislative body of said city, and the excise board of Tulsa county intend, and are about, to appropriate insufficient funds for the payment of the salaries of petitioners as are now fixed by ordinance of said city. It is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State ex rel. Halliburton v. RoachSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- State ex rel. Richards v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Jackson v. Denver Producing & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Luker v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re Referendum Petition No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.