Legal Opinion

Hargrave v. Leigh

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1928No. 4631PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants at law upon two causes of action separately stated, the first for a penalty and damages for a wrongful attachment, and the second for damages for a willful and malicious eviction of the plaintiff from premises leased to her by the defendant Forbes. Trial was had before the court without a jury. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and. against the defendants Forbes, Leigh, and; Pryor for $109 upon the first cause of action, and against defendant Forbes only for $650 upon the second cause of action, the defendants appeal.

The assignments of error relating…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fillebrown v. HoarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Mattingly v. HoustonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Moyer v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Kool v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Disheroon v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeway Park Building, Inc. v. Western States Wholesale SupplyUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lambert v. SineUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wangsgard v. FitzpatrickUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Freeway Park Building, Inc. v. Western States Wholesale SupplyUtah Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API