In Re the Welfare of T.J.J.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court terminated appellant’s parental rights to her two children, G.J. and T.J. Appellant, who is an American Indian, asserts that the court order was not supported by sufficient evidence, that psychologists who testified were not qualified experts under the Indian Child Welfare Act, and that the county did not offer sufficient remedial services to the mother. The court found that clear and convincing evidence showed many of the conditions' listed as grounds for termination under Minn.Stat. § 260.221(b) (1984). The court also found proof beyond a reasonable…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Welfare of HGBSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In re K.A.B.E.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Welfare of SolomonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Helgerson v. RiiffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- People in Interest of JJSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Interest of CWNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- In re L.N.W.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
- I.P. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.