Legal Opinion

Agrolinz, Inc. And Agrolinz Melamin, G.M.B.H. v. Micro Flo Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 20, 2000No. 98-6015PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellants Agrolinz, Inc. and Agrolinz Melamin, G.m.b.H., hereafter collectively referred to as “Agrolinz,” challenge the denial of their motion for summary judgment and the grant thereof to Defendant-Appellee, the Micro Flo Company, requiring Agrolinz to defend itself in arbitration against breach of contract and other claims made by Micro Flo.

On September 8, 1992, Agrolinz, Inc. and Agrolinz Melamin, G.m.b.H. (Agrolinz) and Micro Flo Co. (Micro Flo) entered into a Manufacturing and Distribution Agreement (Agreement) under the terms of which Agrolinz…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilton E. Heyliger v. State University and Community College System of Tennessee, Allen Spritzer and John SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. North Shore Realty Corporation v. GallaherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Hassenteufel v. Howard JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Long v. Kirby-SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Apstein v. Tower Investments of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Comanche Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. Kelsey Saint Clair v. William ZinkDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API