Columbia Bridge Co. v. Kline
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
The facts of this case sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
— Taking for granted that the evidence contained in the bill of exceptions was intrinsically competent to rebut what had come from the other side, the question is, was it offered in season ? It was not produced till the party offering-it had rested the evidence, on his part, at two different stages of the trial, after the reception of the evidence which it was proposed to rebut. He therefore had waived the benefit of it by not producing it at the proper time; after which the court was not bound to admit it. A party must bring forward the several parts of his case in their order, and although…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Wales v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
- Denton v. JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Jackson ex dem. Lynch v. HartwellNew York Supreme Court · 1811
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wright v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875