Legal Opinion

Klem v. Greenwood

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1990No. Civ. 890188Published

1Opinion of the Court

450 N.W.2d 738 (1990)

Ernest E. KLEM, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Mark L. GREENWOOD and Greenwood, Greenwood & Greenwood, P.C., Defendants and Appellees.

Civ. No. 890188.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

January 18, 1990.

Ernest E. Klem, Belfield, pro se.

Zuger, Kirmis, Bolinske & Smith, Bismarck, for defendants and appellees; argued by James S. Hill.

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Ernest Klem appealed from a district court order[1] dismissing his legal malpractice action against the defendants, Mark L. Greenwood and the law firm of Greenwood, Greenwood & Greenwood, P.C. We reverse and remand.

After a mistrial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Olson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rummel v. RummelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lane Co. Ex Rel. Lane v. Busch Development, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Sheets v. Letnes, Marshall & Fiedler, Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API