Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Baron-Huot Oil Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 8, 1945No. Gen. No. 9,965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfe
A proceeding was begun by a complaint filed by Hattie Wagner Crosby against the Baron-Huot Oil Company, June 12, 1943, containing a count at law and a count in equity. The equity count was dismissed by the trial court and need not be considered in this case.
The count at law alleged that the plaintiff leased certain premises in the City of Joliet, Illinois, to the defendant for a term of 15 years, beginning November 1, 1931, at a fixed rental of $100 per month and an additional rental of one half of one cent per gallon of motor fuel sold at said premises during the term of the lease. A copy of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Byrnes v. BalcomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stalvey v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964