Legal Opinion

Hilo Meat Co. v. Antone

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1917No. 988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Reserved Questions from Circuit Judge, Fourth Circuit. •Hon. C. K. Quinn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, J.

(Quarles, J., dissenting.)

The plaintiff, the Hilo Meat Company, Limited, a Hawaiian corporation, brought a bill for an injunction against the defendants August Antone and Charles R. Forbes, superintendent of public works of the Territory of Hawaii, to enjoin the defendants from carrying out the terms of a contract between them whereby the said August Antone was to erect for the Territory of Hawaii an addition to the territorial armory building within the city of Hilo, such addition to be a two-story wooden frame extension approximately 60 x 30 feet and to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Pasadena Sch. Dist. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. C. Chock, Ltd. v. KaneshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kunimoto v. KawakamiHawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  3. A. C. Chock, Ltd. v. KaneshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API