Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Visteon Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2005No. 04-1879UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Ninety former employees of Visteon Corporation appeal the dismissal of their ERISA breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim. Because the lawsuit falls within the scope of a release of claims that the plaintiffs signed, we affirm.

I

When Visteon, a former subsidiary of Ford Motor Company, terminated numerous employees as part of a reduction in force, it offered the terminated employees two options under the Visteon Separation Program (VSP). Under the first option, employees received separation pay of “[u]p to 3 months of base salary” and medical coverage that continued “for a maximum…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  3. Brian Midkiff Monica Midkiff v. Adams County Regional Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Paccar Inc. v. Telescan Technologies, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Dennis S. Leavitt v. Northwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Allison v. L Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Moitoso v. FMR LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  4. Toaster v. General Motors CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API