Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Alexander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1984No. 83-1464PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

The appellant originated his action as one allowed under R.C. Chapter 3111. This chapter provides that an action may be brought for the determination of the existence or non-existence of the father and child relationship. R.C. 3111.04 specifically provides, in part, that such an action may be brought by “* * * a man alleged or alleging himself to be the child’s father * * *.” The court of appeals concluded that such an action could not be brought and involve a child conceived and born during the existence of a marriage. The court stated that “* * * [Reasonable minds cannot differ that this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Walker v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AnonymousSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Hulett v. HulettOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gatt v. GedeonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Walkup v. WalkupOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API