Rushing v. Glover
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
_[iPlaintiffs-Appellants, Dana E. Rushing and Tammy Lemons Rushing (hereinafter collectively “Rushing”), are appealing a judgment rendered in favor of Defendants-Appellees, Donald Ray Glover, Laura Kathryn Cox Glover and Beusa Energy, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Glover”). For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND BACKGROUND
Glover owned a 17.399-acre tract of land, a 25.38-acre tract of land, and a 7.30-acre tract of land, in DeSoto Parish. On August 13, 2001, Rushing entered into two leases with the option to purchase in order to acquire these tracts of land from Glover.
The first…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Monroe Real Estate & Development Co., Inc. v. Sunshine Equipment Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Major Commodity Corp. v. CunninghamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- Raymond C. Davis v. Robert St. RomainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013