Legal Opinion

Rushing v. Glover

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 2012No. 46,980-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

_[iPlaintiffs-Appellants, Dana E. Rushing and Tammy Lemons Rushing (hereinafter collectively “Rushing”), are appealing a judgment rendered in favor of Defendants-Appellees, Donald Ray Glover, Laura Kathryn Cox Glover and Beusa Energy, Inc. (hereinafter collectively “Glover”). For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND

Glover owned a 17.399-acre tract of land, a 25.38-acre tract of land, and a 7.30-acre tract of land, in DeSoto Parish. On August 13, 2001, Rushing entered into two leases with the option to purchase in order to acquire these tracts of land from Glover.

The first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  4. Monroe Real Estate & Development Co., Inc. v. Sunshine Equipment Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Major Commodity Corp. v. CunninghamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Raymond C. Davis v. Robert St. RomainLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API