Legal Opinion

United States v. Blavatnik

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 12, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1631PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the Government’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment. Dkt. 1-4. The United States and Defendant Len Blavatnik have stipulated to entry of a Final Judgment providing for the payment of a civil penalty of $656,000 by Defendant pursuant to Section 7A(g)(l) of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18a(g)(l), the premerger notification provision of the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”). Dkts. 1-2, 1-3. In its motion, the Government asserts that the procedures for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Braeburn Inc. v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Braeburn Inc. v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Seven & I Holdings, Co., Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  4. United States of America v. Deutsche Telekom AgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  5. United States of America v. Deutsche Telekom AgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API