Legal Opinion

Manes v. Manes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.

This case is similar to Orlandella v. Orlandella, ante, 225 (1976), decided today, where we held that the statutes reducing the age of majority from twenty-one to eighteen did not of themselves modify the child support provisions of divorce decrees entered before January 1, 1974, the effective date of the change. An additional element is presented, however, by the fact that the decree in the present case incorporated by reference a separation agreement between the parties. We hold that that fact makes no difference.

The parties were divorced in 1971, and the separation agreement was filed with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schillander v. SchillanderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Whitney v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Gunter v. GunterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dominick v. DominickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Feakes v. BozyczkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. DuMont v. GodbeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  4. Groseth v. GrosethNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pagar v. PagarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API