Legal Opinion

MacSwan v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 9, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of tort in two counts, one for negligence and the other for gross negligence. The *500latter count was waived in open court. The action comes here upon the plaintiff’s exception to the allowance of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. There was no error.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an accident on the lower or street level of the Dudley Street station of the defendant on June 20, 1956. The evidence may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff, who was employed in a bank on Washington Street opposite the station, arrived by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hillman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Legge v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Boden v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Cazneau v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Argueta v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
  3. O'Neil v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Sharpe v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API