Legal Opinion

Rocoo v. Parczyk

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1882PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM SI-IELEY. Appeal in error from tlie Circuit Court of Shelby county. C. W. Heiskele, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarlaND, J.

This action was commenced by Parezyk to recover wages for services rendered tiro defendant Rocco, as confectioner and pastry cook, for a period something more than three years. The employment and service were not denied; the controversy was in regard to the wages the plaintiff was to receive. The plaintiff himself testified that the defendant agreed to pay him at the rate of three dollars .per day, and supported this theory by the testimony of other witnesses. The defendant and his witnesses testified that the contract price was forty dollars per month. The judge instructed the jury to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keen v. AlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API