Legal Opinion

Penn v. Amchem Products

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered June 1, 2009, which granted defendant-respondent Kerr Corporation’s posttrial motion insofar as it sought to set aside the verdict and have judgment entered in its favor as a matter of law, and sub silentio denied the motion, as academic, insofar as it alternatively sought a remittitur, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the jury’s verdict on liability reinstated as against Kerr, and the matter remanded for a new trial solely on the issue of damages for future pain and suffering and loss of consortium,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Wilson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. New York Asbestos Litigation v. John Crane, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Ronsini v. Garlock, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Gavitt v. Citnalta Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Penn v. Amchem ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Chappotin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API