Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hawkins v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1993No. 18S02-9302-CV-225Published

1DissentDeBRULER, Justice

As pointed out by Judge Buchanan for the Second District, Hawkins v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. (1991), Ind.App, 579 N.E.2d 118, this declaratory judgment of the trial court is not a summary judgment and should be reversed because it is based upon determinations of material issues of fact without a trial. Ind.Trial Rule 56; I.C. 34-4-10-9; Bochnowski v. Peoples Federal S. & L. (1991), Ind., 571 N.E.2d 282; Brandon v. State (1976), 264 Ind. 177, 340 N.E.2d 756; City of Muncie v. United Nat. Ins. Co. (1991), Ind.App., 564 N.E.2d 979. I would reverse and remand this case to the trial court to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brandon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Muncie v. United National Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Hawkins v. Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Kay v. Thrift and Profit Sharing PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Bochnowski v. PEOPLES FEDERAL S. & L.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API