Legal Opinion
Gunning v. Quinn
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from circuit court, New York county. Action by Catherine Gunning and James Gunning, as administrators, against Denis Quinn, for conversion of money. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.
This action was brought to recover $1,623.43 alleged to have been converted by the defendant. April 19, 1893, •an order was duly granted and entered in this court by which it was—
“Ordered that said motion be, and the same hereby is, granted, and the •defendant the North River Savings Bank is hereby ordered and directed, upon due service upon it of a certified copy of this order, to pay to James Gunning and Catherine Gunning, administrators of the estate of Martin Gunning, deceased, or to either of them, or to Denis Quinn, their attorney, the sum of $2,359.75 dollars, deposited with said bank…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Everett v. CoffinNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Bush v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Clark v. CostelloNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arkenburgh v. ArkenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1899
- Rose v. WhitemanNew York Supreme Court · 1906
- Art Education Press, Inc. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- James Talcott, Inc. v. Acme Finishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920