Legal Opinion

Vodopest v. MacGregor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1996No. 62553-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

128 Wn.2d 840 (1996)

913 P.2d 779

PATRICIA VODOPEST, Petitioner,

v.

ROSEMARY MacGREGOR, Respondent.

No. 62553-1.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 28, 1996.

Schroeter, Goldmark & Bender, P.S., by William J. Rutzick, for petitioner.

Kraft, Kimbrough & Ganz, by Joseph J. Ganz, for respondent.

Bryan P. Harnetiaux, Gary N. Bloom, and Debra L. Stephens on behalf of Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.

GUY, J.

This case involves a summary judgment which dismissed a negligence action based on an exculpatory clause in a preinjury release. We are faced with the question whether…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Standard Oil Company of California v. Clyde A. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API