Thompson v. McKinney
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought suit to quiet title to certain ranch lands and water rights claimed to be appurtenant thereto. No question arises as to plaintiffs’ ownership of the land. That is conceded. The dispute has to do with the water rights. The ultimate question is whether on mortgage of the land certain water rights owned by the mortgagor passed by the mortgage and foreclosure thereof when there was no express mention of water or water rights either by way of conveyance or reservation.
John L. McKinney and Rhoda J. McKinney, his wife, gave a mortgage dated July 31, 1920, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Humphreys v. McKissockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Koon v. EmpeyIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Lensing v. Day & Hansen Security Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
- Anderson v. HamsonUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Black v. JohansonUtah Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Denver Center for the Performing Arts v. BriggsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Cortella v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Roberts v. RobertsUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Hall v. Springville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
- Hall v. Springville CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.