Legal Opinion
Kurpiel v. Kurpiel
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.
Motion by plaintiff pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [b]) and CPLR 3212. Cross motion by defendants pursuant to CPLR 3212.
The action is for the partition of real property in the Town of Huntington, Suffolk County. Plaintiff and defendant Jenny Kurpiel are husband and wife. Defendant Edward Kurpiel is their son. Prior to June 1, 1955, plaintiff was the sole owner of the property involved. On June 1, 1955, plaintiff conveyed the parcel by deed to “Joseph Kurpiel, Jenny Kurpiel and Edward Kurpiel all residing at 1481 Seamans Neck Boad, Seaford, Nassau County, New York, jointly and not as tenants in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Overheiser v. . LackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of KlatzlNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Jooss v. . FeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Deegan v. DeeganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Willis v. SterlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nelson v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Prario v. NovoNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Melnick v. PressDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Sciacca v. SciaccaNew York Supreme Court · 2000