Legal Opinion

Silmeyer v. Schaffer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of Error to tbe County Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. P. Kimball LelaND, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Joseph Sil-meyer against William Schaffer and Phillip K. Behrend, upon the following promissory note: “§2,758.85. • One year after date, for value received, we promise to pay to the order of Joseph Silmeyer two thousand seven hundred and fifty-eight 85-100 dollars. Peru, Ill., April 19, 1867. .• P. K. Behrekd, Wm. Schaffer.”

Read the full summary

Writ of Error to tbe County Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. P. Kimball LelaND, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Joseph Sil-meyer against William Schaffer and Phillip K. Behrend, upon the following promissory note: “§2,758.85. • One year after date, for value received, we promise to pay to the order of Joseph Silmeyer two thousand seven hundred and fifty-eight 85-100 dollars. Peru, Ill., April 19, 1867. .• P. K. Behrekd, Wm. Schaffer.” Summons was returned served upon the defendants to the September term, 1869, of said court. On the 6th of September, 1869, the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This case is, in all particulars, like Galbraith v. Fullerton, 53 Ill. 126, which had not been reported when the case at bar was tried. On the authority of that case, this judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Galbraith v. FullertonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. HutsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hood v. HollisterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API