Legal Opinion

Claim of Feinman v. Albert Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by Albert Manufacturing Company and another, from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 26th day of April, 19Í5.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

The claimant was employed by the Albert Manufacturing Company as a sewing machine operator in the manufacture of underclothing. While thus employed On or about the 11th day of September, 1914, she was accidentally injured by a needle puncturing her third finger, followed by blood poisoning, which necessitated the amputation of the third finger of her left hand at the first phalange. This appears to have been followed by cellulitis of the joint, so that the third finger has become practically useless. The Commission appears to have had the claim before it on various occasions,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheanon v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sneck v. Travellers' InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bristow Cotton Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Claim of Supple v. Erie RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Claim of Fortino v. Merchants' Despatch Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Claim of O'Neil v. West Side Storage Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. O'Neil v. West Side Storage Warehouse Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API