Legal Opinion

State v. Schorzman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1996No. 22183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

THE COURT’S OPINION DATED AUGUST 2, 1996 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN

MeDEVITT, Chief Justice.

This case involves a contempt order based upon Kristina Schorzman’s failure to pay a criminal fine that was imposed on October 26, 1987. Sehorzman argues on appeal that the magistrate erred in determining that the statute of limitations was not a defense. Sehorzman further asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support the magistrate’s finding of contempt. We affirm the magistrate’s contempt order.

I

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On August 28,1987, Kristina Lynn Schorzman was cited for a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BabbIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Marks v. VehlowIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Downey Chiropractic Clinic v. Nampa Restaurant Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Matter of WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Viveros v. State Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Judy Charney v. Dennis CharneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Andrew GarciaIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. ALPER VS. DIST. CT. (PLISE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  4. ALPER VS. DIST. CT. (PLISE)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Andrew GarciaIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API