Legal Opinion

Stroud v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1923No. 22993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

The appellant, Stroud, appeals from a conviction for assault with intent to kill and murder. The principal complaint is that the testimony in the case does not sustain the indictment, in that it does not show the inteht to kill and murder.

The proof offered by the state at the trial was that appellant, Stroud, called upon J. B. Sanders at the latter’s residence, and immediately produced some papers which he demanded that Sanders sign. Upon the refusal of San*879ders to sign the papers, appellant drew his pistol, cocked it, and pointed it at Sanders, saying, with an oath, that he would kill Sanders…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hairston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Craddock v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lindley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API