Matteodo v. Capaldi

In this case complainants brought a bill in equity seeking to rectify an alleged mistaken omission from the portion of a deed executed in 1912 granting a right of way to respondents over complamhnts’ land. The omission was that the way was to exist only till Gillen street was made passable. Respondents’ answer denied any omission and included a cross bill in which they sought to enjoin complainants from interfering with the right of way. After hearing upon issues of fact the Superior Court found for respondents and entered a decree dismissing complainants’ bill and granting the prayer of the…