Legal Opinion
Neenan v. Woodside Astoria Transportation Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The plaintiff, a passenger in a bus of the Woodside Astoria Transportation Co., Inc. (hereinafter for convenience called the Woodside Co.), was injured in a collision between the bus and an automobile owned by defendant Huppman. On the trial she recovered a verdict of $1,500 for her damages against both defendants. They had, in their answers, denied liability.
Before the trial of the Neenan action, Huppman had sued the Woodside Co. for damages Sustained in the same accident. The suit was defended, but Huppman recovered a judgment which was affirmed on appeal (Huppman v. Woodside Astoria…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- The Haytian RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bell v. . MerrifieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Glaser v. HuetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Bailey v. RoatNew York Supreme Court · 1942