Legal Opinion

STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 3, 1969PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctjeiam :

Subsequent to the entry of the orders appealed from, the defendant brought itself into sufficient compliance. Despite this, the plaintiff presses its contention that the orders were valid when made and were properly upheld in the Appellate Division, and that the defendant's appeal should therefore now be rejected. We agree and affirm for the reasons expressed by Judge Goldmann in his comprehensive opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 100 N. J. Super. 366 (App. Div. 1968).

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintkaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall and Schettino…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. In Re Boardwalk Regency Casino License Appl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Consolidation Coal Co. v. KandleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Toms River Affiliates v. DEPT., ENVIRON. PROTEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API