Legal Opinion

Doe on the demise of Lafontaine v. Avaline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EBJR.OR, to the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Ejectment for a section of land in Miami county. Trial by the Court, and judgment for the <jbfendant.

The evidence, consisting partly of admissions, is all made part of the record, in the form of an agreed case.

Both parties claim title through Catharine Lasselle; the plaintiffs as the heirs at law, the defendant as the vendee of the devisee. Catharine was a daughter of the Miami chief, Richardvitte. Her first husband, Lafontaine, was also an Indian, and, at one time, head chief of the nation. After the death of Lafontaine, she married Francis D. Lasselle, to whom she devised the section of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. Clark v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PeroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. State, ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bash v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. El Pueblo v. GilliesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
  5. People v. GilliesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API