Legal Opinion

Tindall ex rel. Tindall v. United States

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided July 17, 1989No. Civ. A. No. GC 87-5-D-OPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVIDSON, District Judge.

This action, claiming damages resulting from the detonation of an explosive device, comes before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Defendant questions this court’s jurisdiction to hear the instant action, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1); the claim is brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671 et seq., and defendant’s claim fails to come within the FTCA’s limited exception to sovereign immunity. Defendant also moves for dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. McTighe, Hughey & McTighe v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Albert Garza and Felicita Garza, Individually and as Next Friend of Their Child, Robert Garza, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Hercules Powder Co. v. WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Mrs. Ivy L. Gordon v. Niagara MacHine & Tool WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jim W. Tindall, Jr., a Minor by His Father and Next Friend, Jim W. Tindall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API