Legal Opinion · Dissent
State v. Schubert Theatre Players Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 1938No. 31,387Published
1DissentPeterson, Justice
I concur in the dissent upon the ground that the indictment is bad because the allegations could be true and the accused still be innocent. See State v. Isaacson, 155 Minn. 377, 193 N. W. 694. It alleges that the accused distributed the prize by chance either upon or without consideration. If the distribution was actually without consideration, no offense was committed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. IsaacsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923