Legal Opinion
Jorman v. Veterans Administration
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 3, 1984No. 77 C 581PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Six representative plaintiffs remain in this class action against the Veterans Administration and its Administrator (collec tively “VA”). Plaintiffs allege VA, through its home mortgage Loan Guaranty Service (“Service”), has caused or contributed to actual and threatened systematic racial transition (in the vernacular, “white flight”) in parts of Marquette Park, Chicago, in violation of VA’s duty to promote fair housing under Fair Housing Act of 1968 (“Act”) § 808(d), 42 U.S.C. § 3608(c) (“Section 3608(c)”).
Both sides have now moved for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Securities Industry & Financial Markets Ass'n v. United States Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Jurellene Jorman v. Veterans Administration, and Harry N. Walters, Administrator, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Haupt v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Jorman v. Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.