Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1974No. 262PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*131OPINION

EAGEN, Justice.

On June 24, 1970, the appellant, Constance Rodgers, was convicted by a jury in Lancaster County on two criminal indictments: (1) charging the possession and sale of a dangerous drug in violation of Section 780-4 of the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of September 26, 1961, P.L. 1664, § 4, as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-4; and (2) charging the possession with intent to sell obscene books and films in violation of the Act of June 24, 1939, P.L. 872, § 524, as amended, 18 P.S. § 4524.1 A motion for a new trial or in arrest of judgment was denied, and a prison sentence of six…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Kois v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZettlemoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. GraceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. GartnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. LesherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API