Legal Opinion

Pope v. Ledbetter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1927No. 7 Div. 714PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The original bill was filed by the appellant against the appellees for specific performance of the contract between the complainant and Ledbetter, and to cancel the deed executed by Ledbetter to Mrs. Bagley, as a cloud on complainant’s title. The demurrers of the defendants interposed to this bill were sustained, and, by leave of the court and "without objection on the part of the defendants, the complainant withdrew her original bill and filed a substituted bill praying for like relief as prayed in the original bill. The defendants thereupon demurred to the substituted bill, and these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Cottingham v. GreelySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. France v. RamseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Ferris v. HoglanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Altoona Warehouse Co. v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Dudley v. WhatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Endsley v. DarringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API