Probasco v. Clark
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Chief Judge.
It is highly doubtful that when Herbert L. Armstrong created a simple testamentary trust leaving an income to his son for life and the remainder to a church that he foresaw that such a straightforward bequest would lead to this litigation. 1
This case is a variation of the old saw, “Where there is a will, there are relatives.” Here there is a relative who seeks to uphold the provisions of a testamentary trust and a remainderman that desires to accelerate its acquisition of the corpus of the trust. The concept of the old adage, nevertheless, remains the same.
From the record…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowers' Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Johns v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Altemeier v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Stellings v. AutrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AbramsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Vito v. GrueffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Findley v. FaliseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Mary Kirgan v. Manufacturers & Traders TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.