Legal Opinion

The People v. David Mendoza

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2019No. 42Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 42 The People &c., Respondent, v. David Mendoza, Appellant. Caitlin Halpern, for appellant. Gamaliel Marrero, for respondent. DiFIORE, Chief Judge: This appeal presents the issue of whether defense counsel is ineffective for advancing a jury nullification defense at trial. Although jury nullification “is not a legally sanctioned function of the jury” (People v Goetz,

73 NY2d 751, 752

[1988]), we hold that -1- -2- No. 42 counsel’s representation, when…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API