Legal Opinion

(PC) Garland v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 6, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00418Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAUN DARNELL GARLAND, No. 2:23-cv-0418 DAD SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Shaun Darnell Garland, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis. 19 This matter is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before the court for screening.1 (ECF No. 16.) For 21 screening purposes, the FAC states a First Amendment…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API