Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Moses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Charles H. Moses, Henry B. Fanton and William L. Dowling, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 19tli day of January, 1899, upon the report ■of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Cullen, J.:

In 1890 William J. Fitzpatrick entered into a contract with the defendants Moses and Fanton to furnish the plumbing work on a number of houses in the city of Brooklyn, including the one on which the lien in suit was filed. The -contract provided for payments to Fitzpatrick as the work progressed. Disputes arose between the contracting parties as to the performance of the work -and the right of Fitzpatrick to payments. On August 21, 1891, the defendants Moses and Fanton conveyed the property to Louis H Myers. On August twenty-sixth Fitzpatrick filed a notice of lien for the amount…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aeschlimann v. . Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Tri-City Electric Co. v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Vitelli v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Jungbert v. MarretCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  5. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. A.B.C. Cleaning Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API