Legal Opinion

Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP v. Kuper

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 17, 2023No. 20-04062Unknown

1Opinion

AES BENRR CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT SS && & NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS IS) _& Cue 3 NO ENTERED Fi Se THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON ey MY i THE COURT’S DOCKET ged 4 “Ci eS □□ The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. %, (} {. << Signed October 17, 2023 Lape United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION In re: § § Case No. 20-41569-ELM STEVEN KUPER and § CANDICE KUPER, § Chapter 7 § Debtors. § § BELL NUNNALLY & MARTIN LLP, § § Plaintiff, § Vv. § Adversary No.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Robertson v. Dennis (In Re Dennis)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Beaubouef v. Beaubouef (In Re Beaubouef)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. In the Matter of Harold Paul Chastant, Jr., Debtor. Felix Octave Pavy v. Harold Paul Chastant, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API