Legal Opinion
Garland-Sash v. Lewis
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 8, 2009No. 08-0740-cvPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*641SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Joyce Garland-Sash, proceeding pro se, appealed from an October 22, 2007 judgment entered on consent against defendant David Lewis in the amount of $50 after the dismissal of the balance of her claims against Lewis and the remaining defendants. Following appointment of pro bono counsel by this court, Garland-Sash challenges the district court’s (1) limitation of the damages available against Lewis on plaintiffs Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) claim, see 18 U.S.C. § 1030; and (2) jurisdictional dismissal of her potential Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) claim, see 28…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jackson v. KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Rick's Mishroom Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hancock v. Cnty. of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Cooke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Liriano v. ICE/DHSDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Rosario v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Hancock v. County of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.